Global Variations in Practices after Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery; the PARTNER Study.
No Thumbnail Available
Authors
Clyde, Danielle
Grant, Callum
Canales, Juan Andres Aguiar
Adib, Reza
Baig, Sarfaraz
Bhasker, Aparna G
Cameron, David
Catalin, Copaescu
Clare, Ken
de Beaux, Andrew
Issue Date
2025-11-11
Type
Journal Article
Language
en
Keywords
Bariatric and metabolic surgery , Follow-up , Postoperative care
Alternative Title
Abstract
Background: With over 1 billion individuals affected globally, obesity and obesity related diseases is now a leading cause of death. Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) has emerged as a cornerstone intervention for severe obesity and its associated comorbidities. Despite its efficacy, postoperative care and follow-up after MBS remains highly variable worldwide.
Objective: The PARTNER study aimed to evaluate global clinical practices in the postoperative management following MBS by surveying multidisciplinary healthcare professionals.
Methods: This study was an international online survey conducted between October 2024 and January 2025. A multidisciplinary team developed the questionnaire based on existing literature and international guidelines. The survey assessed five domains: follow-up care, postoperative treatment, dietary management, patient support, and measurement of surgical outcomes. Responses were analysed descriptively.
Results: A total of 262 responses were received from 62 countries. Most respondents were bariatric surgeons (72.1%) working in public healthcare systems (73.3%). While 78.7% reported conducting three-month postoperative reviews, only 23.7% offered indefinite follow-up. Hybrid models of care (virtual and in-person) were common (56.9%). VTE prophylaxis and postoperative PPI use were recommended by 64.1% and 84.3% respectively. Nearly all respondents (98.1%) provided dietary advice, with protein and micronutrient supplementation widely endorsed. Only 56.1% routinely referred patients for psychological follow-up. Definitions of surgical success and failure varied widely, with inconsistent objective outcome measures.
Conclusion: The PARTNER study reveals significant international variation in postoperative management practices following MBS. These findings underscore the need for more standardized, evidence-based guidelines to improve long-term outcomes and equity of care worldwide.
Description
Citation
Clyde, D. et al. (2025) 'Global Variations in Practices after Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery; the PARTNER Study', Obesity Surgery. Available At: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-025-08356-9
Publisher
Springer Nature
License
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Journal
Obesity surgery
Volume
Issue
PubMed ID
ISSN
1708-0428